Re: Shouldn't Dana have led LR?
I think Kimberly was the best Pink Ranger ever. Sorry, Jen doesn't come close. And neither does Dana or anyone else.
|
Re: Shouldn't Dana have led LR?
I agree Kimberly is best. Jen was still cool though. Dana could have been much better.
|
Re: Shouldn't Dana have led LR?
I would rank Katherine and Jen the best personally. Dana well, isn't in the conversation to me.
|
Re: Shouldn't Dana have led LR?
Kat was the worst. She was rewarded for being evil and stole Tommy from Kim. I wish Kim could have beat her up and took her powers back. The powers Kat conned away from Kim. But oh well.
|
Re: Shouldn't Dana have led LR?
Katherine was kinda bland to me. I don't think she was evil though. I always liked Cassie the best. She was really cool and had a good personality.
|
Re: Shouldn't Dana have led LR?
How was Kat evil? She was placed under an evil spell like Tommy. Afterwards she felt guilty and did everything in her power to help the Rangers. Kimberly considered her a friend and worthy successor. I would say Jen was the best Pink however.
But lets not forget Taylor. She wasn't a Pink Ranger. But she was a very strong female character. Just as strong as Jen. She also led Wild Force before Cole showed up. |
Re: Shouldn't Dana have led LR?
Kat was a cool Ranger. Don't know what she saw in Tommy lol.
|
Re: Shouldn't Dana have led LR?
Quote:
|
Re: Shouldn't Dana have led LR?
I liked Carter as the leader. He was a good alpha male arch type. I really like Carter's struggle to be the best and be as good as his hero. "Trial By Fire" was a great episode. He was never made the leader officially anyway. So its not like Dana was short changed.
|
Re: Shouldn't Dana have led LR?
Carter was just not very interesting. The subplot with Mr. Mitchill seemed pretty forced. There was no real reason to care about him. He wasn't lead Ranger material. It was baffling Dana was not used as the leader.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.